Texas law prohibiting corporate campaign contributions violates the First Amendment. King Street Patriots, et al., v. Texas Democratic Party, et al., No. 15-0320 (Tex. 2017).


Texas’ outright ban on corporate campaign contributions violates the First Amendment, the Texas Supreme Court has held.  While the state may at times regulate political speech, at this time the only justification for restriction would appear to be quid pro quo corruption, i.e., political favors in exchange for contributions.  While Texas law requires that Supreme Court precedent be followed until overruled, the case relied upon, Federal Election Commission v. Beaumont, 539 U.S. 146 (2003) cannot be reconciled with the Court’s later decisions in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) and McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014).   As quoted in Texas’ published concurrence, “When individuals with a common goal incorporate under state law, government cannot exact as the price of incorporation those individuals’ First Amendment rights.”  Citizens Unitedsupra, at 351.

St. Patriots v. Tex. Democratic Party (Tex., 2017)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s