People v. Barradas-Benitez, Crim. No. B276439 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. Div. 6) (May 3, 2017).

Defendant did not contest having received stolen property.  His suspended sentence was conditioned on compliance with probation conditions which included restitution and staying away from any court proceedings relating to gangs, with which he was known to be affiliated.

Barradas-Benitez argued that precluding his access to the court impaired his First Amendment rights.

The appellate court stressed the importance of rehabilitative conditions, but noted that forbidding access to the courts raised Constitutional concerns.  Where another appellate decision found such a specifically tailored limitation to be unobjectionable, the condition was upheld.

People v. Barradas-Benitez (Cal. App., 2017)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s